Absenteeism is the cost you see. Presenteeism is the cost you miss. One shows up as an empty chair. The other sits at the desk, unwell and unproductive, and often costs more.
A person is away from work and not producing. You see the gap on the roster, and you pay to cover it.
A person is at work but not fully functioning, through illness, pain, exhaustion, or low engagement. The output drops while the chair stays full.
Absenteeism is visible and measurable. Presenteeism is neither, so presenteeism runs unchecked. Research across several economies puts the lost productivity from presenteeism above the cost of absence, often several times higher.¹ Three forces drive the gap.
A low absenteeism rate is not always good news. Sometimes a low rate means people feel unable to take a sick day, so they show up unwell instead. Push absenteeism down with pressure and you often push presenteeism up. The goal is a healthy balance, where genuinely sick people stay home and recover, and the rest show up able to work.
Well below the Australian average, paired with visible illness in the office, points to people working when they should rest.
Missed deadlines, more errors, slower work, while attendance stays high.
A culture where a sick day feels like letting the team down breeds presenteeism.
A worked-through illness that finally forces a longer break is a classic presenteeism cost.
Absence tracks your rate and trend so you spot a climbing rate and a suspiciously low one. Free for teams of 5.
Presenteeism cost estimates are point figures and vary widely by method and sector. Use them for direction, not precision. This page is general information, not medical or legal advice.