Short answer: usually no. You do not dismiss someone for taking legitimate paid sick leave, and you rarely dismiss anyone without a careful, documented process. This guide shows you what the Fair Work Act protects, where the lines sit, and the constructive path most employers should take long before dismissal.
Three layers of protection sit between you and a dismissal for absence. Learn them, and you keep a frustrating situation from becoming a costly claim.
Full-time and part-time employees earn 10 days of paid personal and carer's leave per year under the National Employment Standards. The leave accrues progressively and carries over.¹ Taking leave you owe someone is not, by itself, misconduct.
Section 352 of the Fair Work Act 2009 makes dismissal unlawful when you dismiss an employee because of a temporary absence through illness or injury. When the employee provides evidence, for example a medical certificate, the employee keeps protection for an absence under 3 consecutive months, or under 3 months in total over a 12-month period. An employee who uses paid personal leave for the whole absence keeps protection for the absence, whatever the length.²
Outside those rules, eligible employees still bring an unfair dismissal claim when a dismissal is harsh, unjust, or unreasonable. A dismissal tied to a disability or illness also raises discrimination issues. Process matters as much as the reason.
Some situations let you manage or end employment lawfully. Those situations stay narrow and procedural, narrower than most frustrated managers assume.
An absence runs past the 3-month protection, paid leave runs out, and medical evidence shows the employee will not meet the inherent requirements of the role for the foreseeable future. Dismissal stays lawful here, but only after a fair process, medical evidence, and reasonable adjustments.
No-shows without notice, refusing reasonable requests for evidence, or faking illness are conduct issues, separate from genuine sick leave. These still need a fair process. Raise concerns, allow a response, document everything.
By the time you ask whether you fire someone, the absence has built for months, unmanaged. Ask a sharper question. What does the pattern tell me, and did anyone ever have the conversation?
A structured return-to-work conversation after each absence does two jobs. The conversation gives the employee a fair, documented chance to explain and to get support, the process Fair Work expects. The conversation also links to roughly a 30 percent drop in repeat short-notice absences.³ Most excessive-absence problems never reach dismissal when you hold the conversation early and record the outcome.
Absence keeps a timestamped, Privacy Act-friendly record of every absence and return-to-work conversation. You get the documented, fair process, and you protect your people and your business. Free for teams of 5.
General information only, current as at May 2026, and not a substitute for legal advice. Laws and thresholds change. For your situation, contact the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94 or a qualified employment lawyer.